Subcribe Here!

Enter your email address. It;s free!

Delivered by FeedBurner

Apple opposing Australian encryption law which could set a precedent for the USA

Posted by On 5:59 AM

Apple opposing Australian encryption law which could set a precedent for the USA

Apple opposing Australian encryption law which could set a precedent for the USA

- Oct. 3rd 2018 4:06 am PT


Apple is one of four tech giants to come out in opposition to a proposed new law in Australia which would force companies to provide access to encrypted user data. The fear is that, if the law is allowed to pass, it could set a precedent which other countries are likely to follow â€" with the USA high up the list of likely candidates to effectively ban strong encryption …


Australia is part of the so-called Five Eyes intelligence network which last month issued statements declaring that ‘privacy is not an absolute‘ and the use of end-to-end encryption ‘should be rare.’ All of the Five Eyes nations â€" Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the USA â€" have said they would seek access to encrypted emails, text messages and voice communications via new legislation, suggesting that Australia is being used as a test case.

The Australian government first announced its intention to create new legislation back in June. It did so in the form of a confused statement.

Cyber Security Minister Angus Taylor said there would not be a requirement for a “back door” to be built in to apps and platforms.

“There’s been ideas around for decades that you should create some kind of key that law enforcement can get access t o, to access any data at any time â€" that’s not what we’re proposing here,” Mr Taylor said.

“But at the same time we must ensure that law enforcement doesn’t lose access to the data and the information they need to pre-empt terror attacks and crimes, and to hold criminals and terrorists to account.”

It later revealed that if tech companies failed to have over encrypted data on receipt of a warrant, they would be liable for fines of up to A$10M ($7.2M).

Apple’s stance

Apple is able to provide access to iCloud backups, as these don’t currently use end-to-end encryption, but not to Messages and FaceTime conversations, which do. The only means Apple would have to comply in those cases would be to switch off end-to-end encryption.

Reuters reports today that it is one of four tech companies jointly lobbying against the bill.

Seen as test case as other nations explore similar laws, Facebook, Alph abet, Apple and Amazon will jointly lobby lawmakers to amend the bill ahead of a parliamentary vote expected in a few weeks.

“Any kind of attempt by interception agencies, as they are called in the bill, to create tools to weaken encryption is a huge risk to our digital security,” said Lizzie O’Shea, a spokeswoman for the Alliance for a Safe and Secure Internet.

She said the four companies had confirmed their participation in the lobbying effort.

Photo: Shutterstock

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

Guides AAPL Company

AAPL Company

Breaking news from Cupertino. We’ll give you the latest from Apple headquarters and decipher fact from fiction from the rumor mill.



Privacy is a growing concern in today's world. Follow along with all our coverage related to privacy, security, and more in our guide.

About the Author

Ben Lovejoy


Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!

Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear



Apple Watch Series 3

Apple Watch Series 3

Source: Google Australia | Netizen 24 Australia

« Prev Post
Next Post »