Kasich to Trump: 'Take some steps' on gun control
Kasich to Trump: 'Take some steps' on gun control
66 Feared Dead After Iran Plane Crashes Into Mountain
Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif: Israel 'will see the response' if they act against Iran
MUNICH, Germany â" Iran's foreign minister told NBC News that the recent shooting down of an Israeli fighter jet had destroyed the "myth of invincibility" that surrounded Israel's military for decades.
After "30 years the Syrians were able to down one of its planes," Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif told NBC News in an exclusive interview on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference on Sunday. "And so the myth of invincibility of Israel, of the Israeli military, has crumbled."
Syria "was able to use its own means to bring down one of their planes," he said, referring to last weekend's clashes involving an Iranian drone launched from Syria, a downed Israeli jet and retaliatory airstrikes. "The answer is: Don't violate their airspace ."advertisement Play Iranian Foreign Minister: U.S. is in 'violation' ; of nuclear deal 3:13 autoplay autoplay
Last weekend's showdown began with Israel shooting down an Iranian reconnaissance drone that Israel claimed had entered its airspace. Israel retaliated for the incursion by striking the Iranian base in Syria â" Iran is one of the regime's main backers â" from which the drone was operated. A Syrian anti-aircraft missile hit one of the attacking Israeli F-16 jets, which crashed on Israeli soil after the two pilots ejected.
For more of Bill Neelyâs exclusive interview with the Iranian foreign minister tune in tonight to NBC's âNightly Newsâ
Zarif on Sund ay responded to earlier comments from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said Israel would act against Iran and reiterating his country's position that Tehran was the world's greatest threat.
"We will act if necessary not just against Iran's proxies but against Iran itself," Netanyahu said.
The Israeli prime minister theatrically held a piece of what he said was the Iranian drone that entered Israeli airspace earlier this month, while telling the Munich Security Conference: "Israel will not allow the regime to put a noose of terror around our neck."
Zarif said Sunday, "Well, if they try to exercise that threat, they will see the response."
Israel and Syria have technically been at war since 1948, but signed a disengagement agreement in 1974. Since the start of the civil war some seven years ago, Israel has periodically bombed targets in Syria but the incident last weekend culminated in the largest set of Isr aeli airstrikes against Syrian air defenses since the 1982 Lebanon War. The strikes also hit several Iranian positions in Syria.
Zarif also reiterated that his country would not be the first renounce the landmark nuclear deal between between Iran and six world powers, including the United States, even if the U.S. does.advertisement
Related: Iran, Israel battle openly in race to define ârules of the gameâ
"I believe President Trump has tried to walk away from that deal from Day 1 of his presidency, and he has done everything in bad faith to prevent Iran from enjoying the deal already," he said.
On the presidential campaign, then-candidate Trump criticized the nuclear agreement, calling it "the worst de al ever," and promised to tear it up.
National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster at the Munich conference Saturday urged the international community not to do business with Iran because, he said, profits wo uld go toward funding the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite branch of the Iranian military.
"We believe that a large percentage of the Iranian economy is controlled by the Revolutionary Guards," McMaster said. He also pressed action against the nation's "network of proxies."
âSo the time is now, we think, to act against Iran," McMaster said.
Zarif Sunday called the comments a "violation of the deal," adding "that doesn't mean the deal is broken. The deal is standing because the deal is supported by the international community...."
Since coming to power, the president has extended key waivers that were lifted under the agreement, while also continuing to oppose the deal. He has also said he would work with European allies to remove so-called "sunset clauses" that allow Iran to gradually resume advanced nuclear activities in the next decade.
In contrast to Trump, America's European allies support the agreement and say it is working.advertisement
Trump has also supported targeted sanctions for human rights abuses and ballistic missile development. The Treasury Department's action hits 14 Iranian officials and companies and businessmen from Iran, China and Malaysia, freezing any assets they have in the U.S. and banning Americans from doing business with them.
Israel is also sharply critical of the agreement, as is Saudi Arabia's government. Both see Iran as a major regional threat.Source: Google News
ISIS Claims Deadly Attack at Church in Russian Region of Dagestan
Family that took in Florida shooting suspect call him a 'monster' and say they had no clue what he was planning
Fact-checking Trump's error-filled tweetstorm about the Russia investigation
February 18 at 12:58 PM Email the author President Trump continues to insist the Democrats are responsible for any story relating to Russian interference in the 2016 election despite a year's worth of evidence to the contrary. (Meg Kelly/The Washington Post)
In a tweetstorm that started late at night Saturday and continued into Sunday morning, President Trump railed against the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Hereâs a quick guide to his many misstatements and misleading claims in this Twitter barrage.
Trump claims he ânever said Russia did not meddle in the electionâ and then repeats a line in which he essentially disputed that by saying that a 400-pound hacker sitting in bed could have been behind the interference. One might argue that undermines his statement, but in any c ase, there are numerous instances of Trump suggesting that the Russian intervention in the election was a hoax ginned up by Democrats. He has also denounced the investigation into whether members of the Trump campaign had worked with the Russians, even after meetings and conversations were revealed. But from the start, he has consistently sought to minimize or dispute any possible Russian role in the election.
Here are numerous examples, in the form of a timeline up until Inauguration Day. Note, for instance, that when The Washington Post reported on Dec. 9, 2016, that the CIA had concluded that Russia, in its efforts, favored Trump â" a fact confirmed by the special counselâs Feb. 16 grand-jury indictment of 13 Russians and three companies in a long-running scheme to criminally interfere with the 2016 election â" Trump said on Fox News, âI think itâs ridiculous. I think itâs just another excuse. I donât believe it.â He asserted the source of the story was not t he CIA but Democrats.
According to The Fact Checkerâs database of Trump claims, Trump in his first year as president then 44 more times denounced the Russian probe as a hoax or witch hunt perpetuated by Democrats. For instance, hereâs a tweet from the president after reports emerged about the use of Facebook by Russian operatives, a key part of the indictment:
May 2016: U.S. government says there are indications of attempted cyberattacks on 2016 presidential election.
James R. Clapper Jr., then the director of national intelligence, said his agency had seen indications of attempted cyberattacks on the campaigns. He did not say whether the attempts were successful, whether foreign or domestic hackers were behind them, or which campaign networks were targeted.
June 2016: Russians are blamed for cyberattacks on U.S. campaigns; Trump blames both the Democratic National Committee and Russians for hacks.
June 14, 2016: Democratic National Committee officials and independent security experts concluded that Russian government hackers had breached the committeeâs computer network, gaining access to its database of opposition research on Trump and all email and chat traffic, according to The Post. Russia denied the allegations.Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump says it's "far-fetched" and "ridiculous" to say Russia hacked Democratic Party emails to help him become president. (Reuters)
June 15, 2016: A hacker identifying only as âGuccifer 2.0â took credit for the DNC breach. Yet that day, Trump said the DNC hacked itself:
âThis is all information that has been out there for many years. Much of it is false and/or entirely inaccurate. We believe it was the DNC that did the âhackingâ as a way to distract from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and failed party le ader. Too bad the DNC doesnât hack Hillary Clintonâs 33,000 missing emails.â
July 2016: More hacked DNC emails released; Trump invites Russia to meddle in the campaign.
WikiLeaks released nearly 20,000 emails from the DNC database. Trump, then the GOP presidential nominee, urged Russian hackers to obtain Clintonâs private emails that had been deleted.
âRussia, if youâre listening, I hope youâre able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. â¦ They probably have them. Iâd like to have them released.â
Trump later said he was joking. He rejected allegations that the Russians had targeted DNC or that the Russians were attempting to help him get elected. He accused Democrats of fabricating Russian ties to Trump because they were embarrassed about WikiLeaksâ release of the documents â" even though the previous month, he had said that the DNC had hacked itself.
August 2016: As the GOP presidential nominee, Trump began receiving intelligence briefings this month. Trump reportedly was briefed on cybersecurity and the Russian governmentâs attempts to interfere in the elections, according to NBC News.
Over the next three months, Trump repeatedly denied Russian involvement, blamed the hacks on Democrats and praised WikiLeaks.
Sept. 8, 2016: Trumpâs interview with Larry King aired on RT America, a state-funded Russian television network. Trump said it was âpretty unlikelyâ that Russians were disrupting the elections, which he deemed an âinappropriateâ act.
Here are the key moments from the first 2016 presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on Sept. 26. NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt moderated the debate at Hofstra University in New York. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)
âI think itâs probably unlikely. I think maybe the Democrats are putting that out. Who knows? But I think that itâs pretty unlikely. But, you know, who knows?â If Russia were involved, Trump said he hopes âsomebodyâs going to be able to find out so they can end it because it would not be appropriate at all.â
Sept. 26, 2016: In the first presidential debate, Trump refused to blame Russia.
âI donât think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC. Sheâs saying Russia, Russia, Russia, but I donât â" maybe it was. I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, okay? You donât know who broke into DNC.â
Oct. 7 , 2016: U.S. intelligence agencies released a joint statement saying they were âconfident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.â
Oct. 9, 2016: In the second presidential debate, Trump again refused to blame Russia.
âI notice, anytime anything wrong happens, they like to say the Russians are â" she doesnât know if itâs the Russians doing the hacking. Maybe there is no hacking. But they always blame Russia. And the reason they blame Russia is because they think theyâre trying to tarnish me with Russia.â
Oct. 19, 2016: In the third and final presidential debate, Trump again refused to blame Russia. When pressed, Trump generally condemned the concept of foreign influence on the election.
Moderator Chris Wallace: The top national security officials of this country do believe that Russia has been behind these hacks. Even if you donât know for sure whether they are, do you condemn any interference by Russia in the American election?
Trump: By Russia or anybody else.
Wallace: You condemn their interference?
Trump: Of course I condemn. I donât know Putin. I have no idea.
December 2016-January 2017: Presidential transition
Dec. 9, 2016: The CIA concluded that Russia intervened in the election to help Trump win the presidency, The Post reported.
Dec. 11, 2016: President-elect Trump called The Postâs report âridiculousâ and an excuse made up by Democrats.
âI think i tâs ridiculous. I think itâs just another excuse. I donât believe it. I donât know why, and I think itâs just â" you know, they talked about all sorts of things. Every week, itâs another excuse. We had a massive landslide victory, as you know, in the electoral college. I guess the final numbers are now at 306. Sheâs down to a very low number. No, I donât believe that at all.â (âFox News Sundayâ)
Dec. 12, 2016: Trump tweeted this, even though the hacking was brought up throughout the election.
Dec. 28, 2016: Trump said Americans should move on from Russia allegations and distanced himself from the Obama administrationâs plans to impose sanctions on Russia for alleged interference.
âI think we ought to get on with our lives. I think that computers have complicated lives very greatly. The whole age of the computer has made it where nobody knows exactly whatâs going on. We have speed, we have a lot of other things, but Iâm not sure we have the kind of security we need.â
Jan. 6, 2017: The U.S. intelligence community released a declassified report concluding that Russians influenced the election in an effort to help Trump get elected. Barack Obama and Trump are briefed on this report.
Jan. 10, 2017: CNN and BuzzFeed report about a dossier alleging Trump-Russia ties. The dossierâs existence was first reported by Mother Jones. Trump responds that night on Twitter: âFAKE NEWS â" A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!âFor the first time since he was elected, President-elect Donald Trump held a news conference Jan. 11. Here are key revelations from his question-and-answer session with reporters in New York. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)
Jan. 11, 2017: Trump said for the first time that he thinks Russia was behind the DNC hack.
âAs far as hacking, I think it was Russia. But I think we also get hacked by other countries and other people.â
But later in that same news conference, he backed away from his statement. In subsequent tweets, Trump blamed Democrats and even Republican opponents.
Question: Mr. President-elect, you said, just now, that you believe Russia indeed was responsible for the hacking of the DNC and John Podestaâs emails, et cetera.
Trump: All right, but you know what, it could have been others also.
Trump appears to believe that a massive federal agency is run like the 100-person Trump Organization, where very little escapes the attention of the top leadership. While FBI officials in Miami did not act on the tip about the suspected Florida shooter reported to the bureauâs Public Access Line, there is no evidence that agents involved with that program are involved in the Russia investigation.
In the wake of the indictment, Trumpâs national security adviser, H.R. McMaster, acknowledged on Feb. 17 that evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election is âincontrovertible.â Yet Trump repeatedly has tried to turn the tables on Clinton by claiming that she colluded with the Russians. But there no evidence that is the case, and it makes little sense given Russian President Vladimir Putinâs intense dislike of Clinton.
The reference to âUraniumâ is code for Hillary Clintonâs alleged role in the approval of the sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining rights in the United States to Rosatom, Russiaâs nuclear energy agency. We have fact-checked this repeatedly, since Trump first raised it in the campaign.
Trump sugges ts the State Department under Clinton had sole approval authority on a uranium rights deal with a company largely owned by Russiaâs nuclear energy agency. But the State Department is one of nine agencies in the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States to vet and sign off on all U.S. transactions involving foreign governments. There is no evidence that Clinton herself got involved in the deal personally, and it is highly questionable that this deal even rose to the level of the secretary of state. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission also needed to approve, and did approve, the transfer.
Trump often falsely claims that Clinton âgave awayâ 20 percent of U.S. uranium, but itâs actually only 2 percent of an already small total U.S. production.
âPodestaâ is code for the false accusation that Clinton campaign manager John Podesta was involved with a Russian company. His brother, Tony Podesta, co-founded the Podesta Group, a lobbying firm, with his broth er. But itâs a U.S.-based company, not a company in Russia. Trump probably is referring to the Podesta Group being paid $170,000 over six months to represent Sberbank, a Russian bank. The Podesta Group said its work for Sberbank USA was ânever about getting sanctions liftedâ and âwas simply about helping to clarify to what extent our client, the U.S. subsidiary [of Sberbank], was subject to sanctions. We confirmed they were not.â
As for the âDirty Dossier,â Trump is referring to the fact that the political research firm Fusion GPS, which assembled the dossier as part of an assignment for a law firm that worked for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, relied on a British intelligence agent who used Russian sources for his research. So thatâs a rather big stretch.
Meanwhile, investigators have reached no conclusions about whether Russian involvement changed the outcome of the 2016 election, but Trumpâs electoral college victory wa s very narrow in three key states. In fact, his margin of victory in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania was smaller than the votes garnered by Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, who also won favor with Russian operatives.
Trump falsely suggests there is something nefarious, worthy of an FBI investigation, about a settlement of claims with Iran. The fishy thing about the deal was not that cash was involved â" Iranian banks were cut off from the banking system because of sanctions â" but the timing of it.
On Jan. 17, 2016, the same day that Iran released American detainees â" including The Postâs Jason Rezaian â" the State Department announced a $1.7 billion settlement of claims with Iran.
In the 1970s, the then-pro-Western Iranian government under the shah paid $400 million for U.S. military equipment. But the equipment was never delivered because the two countries broke o ff relations after the seizure of American hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in the wake of the revolution.
A key element in the release of the hostages in 1981 was that the United States agreed to release several billion dollars in Iranian gold and bank assets that had been frozen in U.S. banks.
After the 1981 hostage deal, the two countries set up a tribunal in The Hague to litigate outstanding claims against each other. The $400 million remained unresolved, but U.S. officials say a ruling was expected that would have resulted in the return of the $400 million plus billions of dollars in outstanding interest. Instead, concurrent with the detainee negotiations, the two countries negotiated a deal that resulted in a return of the $400 million plus $1.3 billion in interest.
At the time, U.S. officials touted the agreement as a savings for American taxpayers. âIran is unable to pursue a bigger tribunal award against us, preventing U.S. taxpayers from being ob ligated to a larger amount of money,â Secretary of State John F. Kerry said at the time. Obama said: âFor the United States, this settlement could save us billions of dollars that could have been pursued by Iran.â
The Treasury Department said the $1.3 billion in interest was paid out of a fund associated with the tribunal known as the Judgment Fund, which it says is âa source of funding to pay judgments and settlements of claims against the United States when there is no other source of funding.â
U.S. officials refused to acknowledge a connection between the payment and the release of the detainees, but a Revolutionary Guard commander openly declared that the money was returned in exchange for the ârelease of the American spies.â An Iranian news report said the cash arrived on the same day that the Americans left Tehran.
Ironically, when the deal was announced, the families of more than a dozen Americans attacked or held hostage by Iranian proxies were outraged. They had been told that the $400 million already had been paid to them, as part of a settlement reached by the Clinton administration (and urged on by then-first lady Hillary Clinton), according to an article in Newsweek. But it turned out that the money could not be paid, as Iran had filed a claim for the $400 million in The Hague, and so the families instead received $400 million in U.S. taxpayer funds in 2001. But no one admitted that to the families until Obama announced the new deal 15 years later.
(About our rating scale)
Send us facts to check by filling out this form
Keep tabs on Trumpâs promises with our Trump Promise Tracker
Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletterSource: Google News
Dagestan church shooting leaves five dead in Kizlyar
]]> Europe Europe Dagestan church shooting leaves five dead in Kizlyar
Five people have been killed in a shooting at a Christian church in the Russian republic of Dagestan.
Five others were also injured in the shooting, Russia's interior ministry said.
A local man fired at people leaving an evening service in the city of Kizlyar, Russia's Tass news agency said.
The attacker was shot and killed at the scene, and two police officers were among the wounded, the news agency reports.
Russian media report that the attacker used a hunting rifle, opening fire on worshippers leaving a service during the Maslenitsa celebrations - a traditional pre-Lent festival.
The Islamic State group later said - through its information wing Amaq -that one of its "so ldiers" had carried out the attack.
However, it provided no evidence to back up its claims. The attacker was identified by Russian media as a man who was born in the region in 1995.
IS made the claim in the name of its so-called "Caucasus Province", the last official branch set up by the group.
Since its launch in 2015, that branch has remained relatively quiet, making only a number of low-profile attacks against security personnel in Dagestan.
Russian news outlet RBK Daily quoted an Orthodox priest as saying the attack took place immediately following the afternoon service.
"We had finished the mass and were beginning to leave the church. A bearded man ran towards the church shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (God is greatest) and killed four people," the priest said.
"He was carrying a rifle and a knife," he added.
The injure d have been taken to hospital, and a criminal investigation has been opened into the attack.
Dagestan, located in Russia's North Caucasus near Chechnya and Georgia, is an ethnically diverse and largely Muslim federal republic.
Young survivors of Wednesday's school massacre demand it be a "turning point" on gun control.18 February 2018 Netanyahu attacks 'dangerous Iran tiger' 18 February 2018 Dozens feared dead in Iran plane crash 18 February 2018